Differences of Opinion

Given how strongly I proclaim my theological points on this blog, and based on a recent discussion with a friend who I disagree with theologically in many ways, I have decided it is long past due for me to give at least a brief explication of how I feel about theological differences between Christians (particularly between myself and others). I am a very confrontational person, and thoroughly enjoy a good debate. However, I'm not so pretentious as to believe that there is no other way.

There are a few aspects of Christianity which I take as being fairly non-negotiable. Wealth and power cause problems, all people are guilty of doing bad things, killing people isn't ideal, and Jesus was a special guy. I don't feel like these statements are particularly controversial within Christianity. Some of them get controversial when you start talking definitions, but even in those arguments people will still usually agree on the general statements.

I have studied a wide array of topics, and spent a reasonable amount of time doing so. I wholeheartedly believe that I have very reasonable positions on subjects, supported by a wide array of academic work as well as scripture and prayerful insight, which at times provide much better explanations than the standard or status quo arguments currently used. However, I change my arguments as I learn new information, or realize that certain formulations really aren't sustainable. I know I'm not God. I am wholly fallible, and though I may argue vehemently at times, it is out of a desire to ascertain the truth, not because there is no imaginable way that I am wrong.

I thoroughly enjoy debate. For me, the process of debate is enjoyable both in that it allows open analysis of some idea from varying perspectives which may arrive at a conclusion better than either or prove one position invalid, in either case moving us towards truth, and because debate provides an intellectual challenge which helps me hone my critical thinking, memory and verbal reasoning skills. Debate for me is not something I take personally, even if the subject at hand is one of high personal importance. I don't get offended or angry because someone questions my worldview. Instead, it is an opportunity to refine my own understanding of my worldview and perhaps help someone else do likewise. I have found that many people don't appreciate this gesture, instead interpreting my arguments as a means for me to prove my intellectual superiority. This is in no way my intention. I would much rather know now that I am wrong about some aspect of my life so that I have an opportunity to change. There is nothing attractive to me about living according to a set of principles which do not match reality. I expect those around me to point out when I am wrong so that I may improve, and in following the golden rule, I thus do likewise for them.

"To admit I was wrong is but to say I am wiser now than I was before."

Disagree with me if you like. In fact, if you do disagree with me, please feel free to let me know, and explain why. If the debate goes no where, I am willing to agree to disagree. The world will not end because you can't convince me and I can't convince you. My prayer in all of this is that wisdom will prevail.